Anyone in the world
By EMTAS Specialist Teacher Advisor Lynne Chinnery

With an average of one in six pupils in UK schools
learning English as an Additional Language (EAL), every student teacher will
unquestionably need a solid understanding of EAL pedagogy and how to apply it
in the classroom. But how important is EAL these days? You may have noticed a
distinct lack of focus on EAL in the OFSTED Inspection Framework but there is
at least a mention in the DfE’s Teachers’ Standards. Does this mean that an
understanding of EAL good practice is no longer as important for practitioners
as it used to be? Is EAL support and training no longer required apart from a
cursory nod?
Clearly not, as the number of EAL learners in our schools
is increasing, not declining. The Bell Foundation states that, “nearly half of
all teachers in England will be teaching pupils from diverse backgrounds, and
superdiversity in schools is becoming the norm.” This is no surprise to the
Hampshire EMTAS team as our number of EAL referrals and requests for support
continues to grow.

In fact, schools sought our support for a total of 30
different languages in March alone! It is therefore rather worrying that EAL is
a key area flagged up by both student teachers and newly-qualified teachers as
one they feel the least prepared in.
In a study by The Bell Foundation and the University of
Edinburgh (Foley et al, 2018), a third of student teachers reported that they
had “little” or “little to no” understanding of how to support the language and
literacy needs of their EAL learners.
And although the majority of trainees understood that teachers had a
responsibility for EAL, approximately one half of them said that they had
received no EAL input at all during their school placements. It was even found
that the teacher trainers themselves lacked confidence in their own knowledge
and experience of EAL. This is despite the fact that standard five in the
Teachers’ Standards states that teachers must “have a clear understanding of
the needs of all pupils … including those with EAL” and “be able to use and
evaluate distinctive teaching approaches to engage and support them.”
Furthermore, the National Curriculum Statutory Guidance
(2014, Section 4.5) clearly states that teachers must ‘take account of the
needs of pupils whose first language is not English’, showing that EAL should
be an important component of teacher education programmes. EAL is not a
separate subject, but rather a pedagogy that should be considered throughout
the curriculum, and needs to be taught as a distinct discipline to ensure its
theory, practice and strategies are understood. Students’ training courses can
differ greatly from region to region and the opportunities for EAL experience
will depend very much on the schools they are placed in and the training
provided on their course, all of which seem to be rather hit and miss.
Some areas that were lacking in Initial Teacher Training
(ITT) programmes were identified in the Bell Foundation/Edinburgh University study and
they include:
- understanding the value and use of home
languages in the classroom
- the need for student teachers to expand their
own knowledge about other languages and their differences
- developing understanding of the cognitive and
emotional demands of moving between languages
- learning to apply their EAL theory and
practice across all subjects and levels.
I was particularly surprised that understanding the value
of other languages in the classroom was identified as one of the missing areas.
It seems to me that promoting the first language is one of the key elements of
good EAL practice and the responsibility of every school. Without it, we are
ignoring a significant part of an EAL learner’s life and identity, as well as
missing out on a valuable resource right there in the classroom. (If you
would like ideas and resources to support the use of the first language across
the curriculum, see the section Use of First and Other Languages on our
Moodle.)
Whatever EAL training is put in place for ITTs, it will
need to continue and be built upon as teachers enter their first years of
teaching and beyond. The NQT programme was replaced with the Early Careers
Framework (ECF) in September 2021 and this phase extended to two years. The
Early Career Teachers (ECTs) will have support from a dedicated mentor as well
as time off timetable for induction activities and training, in the hope that
fewer of them will leave the profession during their induction period. The DfE
are also hoping that the ECF will build on the ITT and “become the cornerstone
of a successful career in teaching”.
Yet once again, we have a discrepancy between what is
expected and what is taught. The new ECF is closely aligned to the Teachers’
Standards, and yet makes no reference to EAL, which means that as long as the
training providers stick to the ECT programme, the inclusion of EAL is
discretionary. And so it would seem that the EAL training provided in the ECF
could be as ad hoc as that in the ITT.
The last annual DfE survey of NQTs (which was pre-Covid)
showed that many were concerned about their ability to teach EAL. I doubt much
has changed since then. In her article How well prepared to teach EAL
learners do teachers feel? Emily Starbuck says that “NQTs have consistently
given this aspect of their training the lowest rating.” In fact, most of those
questioned reported having had little or no training on their ITT to enable
them to meet the needs of EAL learners. They also felt that it would be
difficult to improve their practice due to a lack of external guidance; many
stating that CPD opportunities and school support in the field of EAL were
unavailable. As one teacher in the survey said, “Most of the training was
geared towards mainstream.”
The Bell Foundation report clearly states that in order for all
teachers to be prepared to meet the needs of EAL learners, Initial Teacher
Education should not be seen as a separate component in a teacher’s career but
should be viewed as the first step in their continuing professional
development. It is therefore important that the groundwork on EAL taught to
trainee teachers in the ITT stage is built upon as they progress through their
careers.
Why then is EAL not being addressed more in Initial Teacher
Training (ITT) programmes and the ECF? Without knowledge of best-practice
principles in the field of EAL and guidance on how to apply them, student
teachers and early career teachers are more likely to make poor or uninformed
decisions when faced with learners who are new to English as well as more
advanced EAL learners. Some examples
the EMTAS team have seen include the deceleration of students, unnecessary withdrawal from the
classroom and the use of inappropriate resources. Inexperienced
students and teachers are also more likely to judge a student’s ability from
their spoken communication (BICS), and therefore fail to provide enough support
with their academic and literacy skills (CALP). (To understand BICS and
CALP, watch this: Terms
to Know: BICS and CALP.)
Newly-qualified and student teachers
will need ideas and strategies that they can use to scaffold the curriculum
content for their EAL learners; an hour-long session on ‘the basics’ of EAL is
not going to suffice. With this in mind, I have been working with my colleagues
at Hampshire EMTAS on an in-depth ITE and ECF training programme to fill this
potential void and deliver up-to-date training. Using the pedagogy of EAL to
guide the trainees, but with practical ideas for EAL support in the classroom,
we hope that our training programme will give the attendees the confidence they
need.
We hope that the termly training
sessions will run as a steady progression from Initial Teacher Training right
through to the end of the Early Career Teacher programme. The training will
consist of a set of modules, based on the findings of The Bell Foundation's
recent research, but using strategies, resources and ideas from across the
Hampshire EMTAS Teacher Team. Each session is designed to be as interactive as
possible, with plenty of group activities and discussion, so that the trainees
have the opportunity to share their experiences in the classroom and learn from
each other. This will have the additional benefit of promoting the value of
collaborative work by having the trainees experience it for themselves.
There will be a reflective journal to
accompany the course so that the ITTs and ECTs can review their learning and
thoughts from each session, as well as plan strategies to explore once back in
the classroom. Some of the areas that will be included in the training are:
- understanding the
stages of language development such as the silent period
- ways to include
the EAL learner in the classroom and scaffold their learning
- collaborative work
and setting/grouping
- knowing how to
advise parents on bilingualism/multilingualism
- assessment,
tracking and planning for EAL.
We also ensure that student teachers
and ECTs are made aware of appropriate, up-to-date resources and where to find
them.
By equipping students and teachers with the knowledge and
strategies they need, I hope that they will view EAL in a similar way to Sheila
Hopkins: 'multilingualism should be seen as a valuable resource and an integral
part of a child’s identity, rather than as a hindrance'.
I will continue to work and build on the training course
and hope to share my progress once I'm done – although as we all know from Kolb’s
Learning Cycle, a teacher’s work, just like a student’s, is never really
“done.”
References
Hampshire EMTAS Guidance
Library
[ Modified: Monday, 16 May 2022, 11:45 AM ]